Forgery and Fraud Lawsuit Filed against Lutherville, MD Car Dealership

A lawsuit alleging forgery and fraud was filed against a Lutherville, Maryland car dealership by Whitney, LLP’s auto fraud lawyers.  This blog post discusses the allegations made in the lawsuit. To watch a video made by Whitney, LLP on how to detect forgery and fraud in your own car sales documents, click here.

Here are the 10 most common schemes at Maryland car dealerships that Whitney, LLP helps our clients with. If one of these happened to you, or you feel the dealer cheated you, call us to discuss your legal rights with a Legal Consultation.

Top 10 Car Dealership Problems Our Auto Fraud Lawyers Deal With

Our lawyers help unwind bad deals and recover compensation for car buyers. We offer Legal Consultations. Call us at 410 583 8000, or use our Quick Contact Form online.

Whitney, LLP’s auto fraud attorneys represents car buyers in cases across Maryland, with many frauds and misrepresentations arising at dealerships in Baltimore, Pasadena, Cockeysville, Owings Mills, Temple Hills, Marlow Heights, Silver Spring, Frederick, Waldorf, Glen Burnie, Gaithersburg, Rockville, Ellicott City and Salisbury.

Examples of similar cases and settlements we have recovered for our clients who were victims of auto dealer fraud can be reviewed here.

Forgery and Fraud at a Lutherville, MD Car Dealership

Although our client bought the car in 2018, the lawsuit was not filed until over a year later when the extent of the fraud was discovered and she hired Whitney, LLP to represent her.  If you have been defrauded by a car dealership, even if it was years ago, you may be able to bring the lawsuit even though years have gone by. It depends on the facts, and Whitney, LLP’s attorneys can help you evaluate the timing of your claim, with a free car contract review and legal consultation.

Our attorneys have successfully sued many dealerships in and around Lutherville, Cockeysville, Owings Mills and Pikesville in a variety of schemes and unwound bad deals and recovered compensation for our clients.

car dealer did not pay off my trade in  300x200 - Forgery and Fraud Lawsuit Filed against Lutherville, MD Car Dealership

Dealership Sued for Forged Signatures on Contracts and Warranty Documents

Our client is a senior citizen who went to a Lutherville dealership by herself. As an aside, it is often a dangerous situation for anyone who is not a finance expert to go to a car dealership by themselves.  Whitney, LLP has represented many cases of car dealership fraud involving both men and women who go to a dealership and are badly defrauded. We suggest that if you are a person with no experience in car dealership finance or car buying, you bring a second person who can help you evaluate the deal. Another set of eyes and ears on a car deal is always a good idea. 

In 2018, Ms. X went to the dealership to purchase a new car.  She found a car she liked, but the dealership did not have the color in stock that she wanted.  The dealer said they would get the color she wanted by the following day.  Ms. X returned to the dealership, and the grey car that she liked had arrived, with a window sticker price of $22,800 (the “Vehicle”).

Ms. X then met with the finance manager.  The finance manager asked her if she wanted to buy a LoJack anti-theft tracking system for the Vehicle, which she agreed to. The finance manager then asked her if she wanted to buy a pre-paid maintenance plan, which she agreed to.

The finance manager told Ms. X to sign the Buyer’s Order, which she did.  The base price of the Vehicle was listed as $22,299.77, and included LoJack for a charge of $4,100, and another line-item of “Service Contract and/or Pre-Paid Maintenance” for $5,000.  A charge of $4,100 for LoJack is an astronomical amount of money, and indicates that the finance manager knew they had a customer they could take advantage of.  The cost of a LoJack to the dealer is typically between $150 and $350.

After signing the Buyer’s Order, Ms. X was given a copy of the Retail Installment Sales Contract to sign, which she did. On the RISC, a “Service Contract” is listed for $3,000, and a Safe Driver Maintenance Contract” is listed for $2,000. There was no entry for LoJack for $4,100.  

After signing the Buyer’s Order and RISC, Ms. X was given a pink carbon copy of the Buyer’s Order, and a yellow carbon copy of the RISC. She was not provided with copies of any paperwork for LoJack, a “Service Contract” or a maintenance contract, all for which she had just been charged a total of $9,100.  

Car dealerships are required to provide all contract paperwork at the time of sale, including the car contract or lease agreement, warranty documents, vehicle service contracts, and other documents signed by the customer. Many customers do not know that if they are not provided with a fully signed copy of the contract at the time of sale, they are able to return the vehicle.

Screen Shot 2020 04 20 at 10.18.35 AM 300x164 - Forgery and Fraud Lawsuit Filed against Lutherville, MD Car Dealership

Original Buyer’s Order – Our client was given the pink carbon copy at the time of sale.

Screen Shot 2020 04 20 at 10.20.31 AM 300x162 - Forgery and Fraud Lawsuit Filed against Lutherville, MD Car Dealership

Alleged Forged Buyer’s Order – LoJack was changed to Tire and Wheel and GAP Insurance was added among other changes. Our client obtained this when she went back to the dealership months after the purchase when she discovered that the $4,100 she had paid for LoJack had been kept by the dealership and LoJack had not been installed.


The Car Dealer Kept the LoJack Money – LoJack Fraud

In 2019, Ms. X took a second look at the contract paperwork for the Vehicle, and realized she had not been given a copy of her LoJack contract or any of the other services she believed that she had paid extra for. Thereafter, later on in April 2019, Ms. X went to Nationwide’s dealership and asked to speak with a finance manager about her contract.  She met briefly with a finance manager, and asked if the LoJack had been installed on her Vehicle.

The finance manager responded that “once your car leaves the lot, we do not know what is on it.”  Ms. X asked him for the number for LoJack, which he provided. Several days later, Ms. X called LoJack’s corporate office, and asked an employee if the Vehicle had a LoJack system installed. She provided her information as well as the Vehicle’s VIN. The employee determined that no contract had been received by LoJack for the Vehicle, and there was no information in the system for the Vehicle. The LoJack employee asked Ms. X how much she had been charged for the LoJack. When Ms. X told her “$4,100” the employee gasped, and said “the charge for that is usually no more than $800.” Ms. X began to get a sinking feeling that something had gone very wrong.

It is not uncommon for dealerships to charge a huge amount of money for aftermarket products such as LoJack, warranties, dent and ding protection, tire and wheel protection packages and other products.  Our experience is that they will charge as much as they can get away with.

If d dealership charged you for a LoJack anti-theft security system and one was not installed, or the dealer kept your payment for LoJack without providing it to you, you have legal rights and can bring a claim for compensation. Whitney, LLP’s auto fraud lawyers represent car buyers in LoJack claims against dishonest dealerships.

Discovering Forged Signatures on Car Sales and Warranty Contracts

Ms. X then called the dealer and requested a copy of all of the paperwork she signed as part of her deal for the Vehicle. She was told to come to the accounting office and pick up a copy, which she did. When she opened the envelope from the accounting office and reviewed the documents, she was shocked to see numerous documents she had not seen before, including many with her name signed on them, that she has not signed and had not given the dealer or finance manager permission to sign on her behalf. They included:

a) A forged Retail Installment Sales Contract that had been e-signed, and was dated August 9, 2018, the day after she had been at the dealership and signed the RISC that she received a carbon copy of.  The forged RISC includes charges for GAP insurance at a cost of $2,500, and a “Tire and Wheel” package for $2,500.  

b) A forged Customer Application for PrePaid Maintenance at a price of $2,200, dated August 8, 2018.

c) A forged Tire and Wheel Protection Plan contract, at a price of $4,100, dated August 8, 2018. 

d) An unsigned GAP Addendum dated August 8, 2018, at a cost of $2,500. 

e) A forged Credit Application dated August 9, 2018 that falsely inflated our client’s income to $72,000. 

f) A forged Buyer’s Order dated August 8, 2018, that lists a $4,100 charge for “Tire Wheel”, a $2,800 charge for GAP Insurance, and a $2,200 charge for “Service Contract and/or pre-paid maintenance.” 

Generally speaking, the addition of aftermarket services to a forged Retail Installment Sales Contract is done not to benefit the unaware victim of the forgery, but because the corrupt finance manager and dealership are able to increase their profits by increasing the number of aftermarket products they “sell” to a customer.

Maryland Law Prevents Fraud by Car Dealerships

The law in Maryland specifically prohibits dealerships from committing fraud to make a sale. However, that does not stop dishonest car dealerships from lying and misrepresenting in order to make an illegal profit. 

The Maryland Transportation Code Ann., § 15-312(b) titled “Prohibited Acts – – Vehicles Sales Transactions,” reads as follows: “Making material misrepresentations in obtaining vehicle sales contracts. – A dealer or an agent or employee of a dealer may not make any material misrepresentations in obtaining a vehicle sales contract.”

The Maryland Transportation Code Ann., § 15-312(c) titled “Prohibited Acts – – Vehicles Sales Transactions,” reads as follows: “Fraud – – A dealer or an agent or employee of a dealer may not commit any fraud in the execution of or any material alteration of a contract, power of attorney, or other document incident to a sales transaction.

While these two statutes are laws, car dealerships are also require to follow administrative regulations set forth by by the Motor Vehicle Administration, known as the MVA.  Those regulations can be viewed here.

On behalf of our client, Whitney, LLP sued the dealer and filed the lawsuit alleging fraud, fraudulent concealment, violation of Maryland’s Consumer Protection Act, and invasion of privacy.  The compensation sought includes actual damages, emotional distress and punitive damages. These are all common legal causes of action when Whitney, LLP represents a customer suing a car dealership in a matter involving allegations of forgery and fraud.  

home whitney 300x209 - Forgery and Fraud Lawsuit Filed against Lutherville, MD Car Dealership

Daniel W. Whitney, Sr. and Daniel W. Whitney, Jr.

Attorneys to Help Consumers Fight Car Dealership Fraud

Whitney, LLP helps car buyers who are victimized by car dealerships and their dishonest employees.

Call us at 410 583 8000, or use our Quick Contact Form to get started with your Legal Consultation and to discuss suing a car dealership that cheated you. 


“When others did not want to take my case Whitney, LLP was willing. Dan was very very patient with me and his communication was always on point no matter how he reached out. He helped me and my family start our lives all over, I thank him so much.”

– Client

Read More Testimonials

“I would definitely recommend this firm. I contacted them just to get some insight and I was informed that I indeed had a case, and they won! Any questions or concerns I had were answered and explained clearly. They were very kind and informative throughout the whole process. I am very grateful that I stumbled across their page, it has changed my life. Thank you.”

– Client

Read More Testimonials


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


409 Washington Ave,
Suite 750
Towson, MD 21204
P: (410) 583-8000
F: (800) 893-1239


An attorney-client relationship is created only once a representation agreement is signed. Prior results are not a guarantee of future results, and all cases are different. This website does not provide legal advice.


Whitney, LLP fights for the injured and deceived. We offer legal consultations.


© Whitney, LLP | Sitemap | Privacy Policy
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Call Now Button